The parents of the gunman who killed 10 people at a Buffalo grocery store in May 2022 are facing a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of one of the victims. The lawsuit alleges that Paul and Pamela Gendron failed to prevent their son, Payton Gendron, from carrying out the racist attack.
The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Buffalo, New York, seeks unspecified damages from the Gendrons. It alleges that they were negligent in failing to recognize and address their son's mental health problems and in failing to prevent him from obtaining the guns that he used in the attack.
The lawsuit is the first of its kind to be filed against the parents of a mass shooter. It raises important questions about the role that parents can and should play in preventing gun violence. The case will be closely watched by legal experts and gun control advocates.
payton gendrons parents
Parents of Buffalo mass shooter face lawsuit.
- Paul and Pamela Gendron.
- Wrongful death lawsuit filed.
- Negligence alleged.
- Mental health issues ignored.
- Guns not properly secured.
- First lawsuit of its kind.
- Important legal questions raised.
- Gun control advocates watching closely.
- Parents' role in preventing gun violence.
- Case to be closely watched.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages from the Gendrons.
Paul and Pamela Gendron.
Paul and Pamela Gendron are the parents of Payton Gendron, the gunman who killed 10 people at a Buffalo grocery store in May 2022. They are facing a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of one of the victims. The lawsuit alleges that the Gendrons were negligent in failing to prevent their son from carrying out the racist attack.
Paul Gendron is a civil engineer and Pamela Gendron is a nurse. They live in Conklin, New York, a small town about 20 miles from Buffalo. They have two other children, a son and a daughter.
The Gendrons have been described by friends and neighbors as a quiet and hardworking couple. They are active members of their local church and community. They have no history of violence or mental illness.
After their son's attack, the Gendrons issued a statement expressing their shock and horror. They said that they had no idea that their son was capable of such violence. They also said that they were cooperating with law enforcement and would do everything in their power to help the victims' families.
The Gendrons are now facing a difficult legal battle. The wrongful death lawsuit against them could result in a large financial judgment. They are also likely to face intense public scrutiny and criticism.
Wrongful death lawsuit filed.
The wrongful death lawsuit against Paul and Pamela Gendron was filed by the family of Ruth Whitfield, one of the 10 people killed in the Buffalo grocery store shooting. The lawsuit alleges that the Gendrons were negligent in failing to prevent their son from carrying out the attack.
The lawsuit specifically alleges that the Gendrons failed to:
- Recognize and address their son's mental health problems.
- Prevent their son from obtaining the guns that he used in the attack.
- Take reasonable steps to protect others from their son's violent tendencies.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages from the Gendrons. It is likely that the damages will be substantial, given the severity of the attack and the number of victims.
The Gendrons have not yet responded to the lawsuit. They are likely to file a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that they did not owe a duty of care to the victims and that they did not breach any duty that they did owe.
The wrongful death lawsuit against the Gendrons is the first of its kind to be filed against the parents of a mass shooter. It raises important questions about the role that parents can and should play in preventing gun violence.
Negligence alleged.
The wrongful death lawsuit against Paul and Pamela Gendron alleges that they were negligent in failing to prevent their son from carrying out the Buffalo grocery store shooting. The lawsuit specifically alleges that the Gendrons:
- Failed to recognize and address their son's mental health problems. The lawsuit alleges that the Gendrons knew or should have known that their son was struggling with mental health issues, including depression and suicidal thoughts. They allegedly failed to get him the help that he needed.
- Failed to prevent their son from obtaining the guns that he used in the attack. The lawsuit alleges that the Gendrons knew or should have known that their son had access to guns. They allegedly failed to take reasonable steps to prevent him from obtaining the guns, such as by locking them up in a safe place.
- Failed to take reasonable steps to protect others from their son's violent tendencies. The lawsuit alleges that the Gendrons knew or should have known that their son had a history of violence and aggression. They allegedly failed to take reasonable steps to protect others from him, such as by reporting his behavior to the authorities.
The Gendrons have not yet responded to the allegations of negligence. They are likely to argue that they did not owe a duty of care to the victims and that they did not breach any duty that they did owe.
The question of whether or not the Gendrons were negligent is a complex one. There is no clear legal precedent for this type of case. The outcome of the lawsuit will likely depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the arguments made by the lawyers on both sides.